Summary of "Communication between healthcare professionals and patients with hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis"

Summary published March 12, 2025

Summary by Tricia A. Meyer, MS, PharmD, FASHP, FTSHP

American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy | June 2024

Weerapol N, Leelakanok N. Communication between healthcare professionals and patients with hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024 Jun 11;81(12):521-530. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae045. Erratum in: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024 Jun 24;81(13):e335. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae117. PMID: 38430534.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae045

  • Hearing loss can be a significant barrier to effective communication between patients and their healthcare providers, and patients with impaired hearing are at risk for missing important information regarding their own health.
  • In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors evaluated published evidence on modes of communication between healthcare professionals and patients with hearing loss.
  • The authors searched relevant databases (e.g., MEDLINE/PubMed) for studies that addressed the prevalence of different modes of communication between patients with hearing loss and their healthcare providers.
  • Forty-two studies were included in the systematic review and 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis. These studies included patients identified as deaf, with hearing loss, hard of hearing, or members of the Deaf community.
  • The use of hand gestures (often accompanied by verbal communication or writing) was reported in 54.8% of pooled interactions. While this mode of communication was often selected because for convenience (and thus preferred by healthcare providers), in general patients did not prefer this mode of communication.
  • 5% of reported interactions relied upon using an accompanying person or family member to facilitate communication between the hearing-impaired patient and healthcare provider.
  • Only 8.4% of reported interactions used a qualified sign language medical interpreter, despite this being recognized as the most effective mode of communication between healthcare providers and patients with impaired hearing.
  • Technologies to assist communication were frequently used, with hearing aids (57.4%) being most common. Other assistive technologies included cochlear implants, speech-to-text apps on smartphones, and video remote sign language interpretation services.
  • Important barriers to effective communication included: lack of availability of sign language interpretation, language differences (including different forms of sign language used in various countries), and frequent misunderstandings when relying on lipreading and/or writing. In addition, the authors noted that in some patients with hearing loss, education level, health knowledge, and written language literacy may also be barriers to effective communication.
  • The authors recommend improving communication between patients with hearing loss and healthcare providers by expanding access to qualified interpreters and sign language assistive technology.
Continue Reading